A group of scientists working in Ivory Coast may have
discovered a case of infection of a human with a novel variety of an animal
immunodeficiency virus, in circumstances that suggest it was a direct infection
from an animal. The research was presented at the 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Seattle.
There are a number of other explanations for the appearance of
a never previously observed variety of HIV-2 in a blood sample collected from
an eight-year-old boy, but the researchers suspect that their finding may
illustrate that animal-to-human immunodeficiency virus infections continue to occur
sporadically.
HIV-2 is not a particularly pathogenic virus in the majority
of patients who acquire it; many people never develop clinical symptoms and it
remains to be seen whether this variety is transmissible or will be a single
‘dead end’ infection – or indeed whether it is a viable virus at all.
HIV-2 is a separate immunodeficiency virus from HIV-1. Its
animal host is the sooty mangabey monkey, which is native to a swathe of forest
in west Africa stretching from Senegal to Ivory Coast. Sabina Locatelli of
Montpellier University in France reminded the conference that there are eight
known subspecies of HIV-2 (A to H), each representing a separate transfer of
sooty mangabey monkey virus (SIVsmm)
to humans: we know this because human HIV-2 species are as genetically distinct
from each other as monkey varieties are, and are more similar to related monkey
strains than to unrelated human ones. Only two HIV-2 strains, A and B, have
given rise to more than single infections, and the nearest monkey precursors to
five out of the eight strains, including A and B, have been found in the Taï
National Park in southwest Ivory Coast.
The researchers therefore retrospectively tested 776 blood
plasma samples, from 18 villages bordering the Taï National Park, for antibodies to HIV-1, HIV-2 and varieties of SIV seen in local
species of monkey (not just sooty mangabeys). If samples were positive for
antibodies to HIV-2 or SIV antigens, they were retested using a PCR viral load
test to detect active viral infection. This is because the presence of
antibodies could in some cases indicate nothing more than the presence of viral
proteins, rather than active infection, in the blood. PCR-positive samples were
then phylogenetically analysed to determine what strain of HIV-2 they belonged
to.
HIV-1 was quite common in the villagers: 50 samples (7.8%)
tested HIV-1 positive. Six samples (0.8%) were positive to HIV-2, which is
close to HIV-2 prevalence in the area (about 1-2%). Three samples tested
positive to antibodies to SIV species: one to a variety found in a
colobus monkey and two to varieties from a mandrill. None of these three species
were PCR-positive, indicating that the villagers’ bodies were reacting to
passive transfer of antigens from monkey
viruses that had got into their blood, but that there was no active viral
infection. The age of five of the six people giving HIV-2 antibody-positive
samples ranged from 40-70, indicating that a historical wave of HIV-2 type A/B
infection may no longer be being spread, as other studies have
found.
Only three of the HIV-2 samples tested PCR-positive,
indicating active infections. Of these, two were from known type A and B
species, one in a 60-year-old man and one in a 40-year-old woman.
The third virus was a completely novel variety. It was much
more similar to certain types of SIVsmm than to human varieties in
its core p24 protein, though intriguingly its envelope gp41 protein appeared
to mix human and monkey genetic sequences.
Furthermore it was found in an 8-year-old boy. Where did it
come from? If it was HIV-1, the obvious conclusion would be from his mother,
but mother-to-baby transmission of HIV-2 is virtually unknown, one of the
factors that limit its spread. Another cause might be unsterilised medical
equipment. But the most likely explanation appeared to be animal-to-human
infection, especially since the three positive SIV antibody tests indicated
that monkey viruses not uncommonly get into the human body – through scratches,
cuts or bites – without causing infection.
Monkeys are often hunted: there is not only a large bushmeat
trade in the local area, but small monkeys like mangabeys are also often kept
as pets and a child might catch a monkey virus either from helping butcher a
monkey or from a pet.
More samples need to be collected and analysed
before we can be clearer where this virus came from, including testing the
boy’s mother. We also do not yet know if this virus – if it indeed came from a
monkey – is capable of human-to-human transfer. Its apparent recombinant nature
is intriguing: was this a monkey virus with some human sequences that aided
infection? Or successive HIV and SIV infections that recombined in the boy? But
its presence shows that immunodeficiency viruses may still be migrating on
occasion from animals to humans, and the high local HIV-1 prevalence shows that
the conditions for their spread persist in many areas.