Abacavir impairs endothelial function, possibly explaining increased heart attack risk

Michael Carter
Published: 30 September 2009

Treatment with abacavir impairs endothelial function, providing a possible explanation for the drug’s association with an increased risk of heart attack, US investigators report in the September 24th edition of AIDS.

They found that patients currently receiving abacavir (as well as those who had taken the drug in the past) had impaired flow-mediated dilation in the brachial artery compared to individuals with no history of treatment with the drug.

Patients with HIV have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A number of reasons have been suggested for this including inflammation, the effects of HIV, and the side-effects of antiretroviral drugs.

Some studies have recently found an association between treatment with abacavir (Ziagen, also in the combination pills Kivexa and Trizivir) and heart attack. The reasons for this are not understood. However, it has been suggested that therapy with the drug is associated with impaired endothelial function, an established predictor of cardiovascular disease.

Measuring flow mediated dilation in the brachial artery can predict which patients have a future risk of cardiovascular disease. This measurement can change rapidly in response to the use of anti-HIV drugs, and is sensitive to inflammation. Investigators involved in the Study of the Consequences of the Protease Inhibitor Era (SCOPE) cohort therefore performed a study to see if flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery was impaired in HIV-positive individuals with a history of treatment with abacavir.

A total of 61 individuals were involved in the study. All had been taking stable antiretroviral therapy for at least six months and had a viral load below 75 copies/ml. The patients had been infected with HIV for a median of 18 years, and their median CD4 cell count was 369 cells/mm3. The median age of these patients was 50 years and 95% were men. Abacavir was currently being taken by 30 patients, and the median duration of therapy with the drug was a little over one year.

Results showed that endothelium function was impaired in the cohort, with median flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery being 3.5%.

However, this flow mediated dilation was significantly more impaired in patients taking abacavir than it was in individuals who were not receiving this drug (2.8% vs 4.9%, p = 0.01).

Five patients had a previous history of treatment with abacavir, and these individuals had significantly poorer flow mediated dilation than those who had never taken abacavir (p = 0.04).

The association between abacavir treatment and impaired endothelial function remained significant after the investigators took into account traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as family history, diabetes, high blood pressure and high lipids.

“Our study may help provide a biological mechanism for the association between myocardial infarction and recent or current abacavir use seen in observational studies”, comment the investigators. They add, “future studies will need to confirm our findings and to help determine if abacavir-associated impairment in endothelial function contributes to the clinically observed relationship between current abacavir use and myocardial infarction.”


Hsue PY et al. Association of abacavir and impaired endothelial function in treated and suppressed HIV-infected patients. AIDS 23: 2021-2027, 2009.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.