Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
A man being given a finger-prick HIV test
Researchers argue that adding a finger-prick test for HIV to the standard new patient health check would prevent undiagnosed patients passing on the virus. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Researchers argue that adding a finger-prick test for HIV to the standard new patient health check would prevent undiagnosed patients passing on the virus. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

HIV tests for GPs' new patients could save lives and money, says study

This article is more than 6 years old

Researchers find fourfold increase in diagnosis rate when testing carried out as part of surgeries’ registration health check

Offering routine HIV tests to people when they register with new GP surgeries in high-risk areas is cost-effective and could save lives, a study has shown.

The researchers are calling for HIV screening to be introduced in all 74 local authorities in England with high rates of infection with the virus.

High HIV prevalence is defined as having more than two diagnosed infections per 1,000 adults in a given area.

An estimated 13,500 people in the UK do not know they carry the virus that causes Aids, meaning they miss out on treatment and pose an infection risk to others.

Dr Werner Leber, from Queen Mary University of London, led the study, which involved more than 86,000 people from 40 GP surgeries. He said: “We’ve shown that HIV screening in UK primary care is cost-effective and potentially cost-saving, which is contrary to widespread belief.

“This is an important finding given today’s austerity. Financial pressures, particularly within local authorities’ public health budgets, mean that the costs of HIV testing are under intense scrutiny, and in some areas, investment in testing has fallen.”

The scientists conducted a trial which tested the effectiveness of rapid finger-prick HIV testing as part of the standard health check carried out during GP registration.

They found it led to a fourfold increase in the HIV diagnosis rate.

A mathematical model showed primary care HIV screening in high-prevalence areas became cost-effective after 33 years. But factoring in the higher costs of care for people diagnosed late showed that screening could become cost-effective far sooner.

The annual cost of rolling out HIV screening to all 74 high-prevalence authorities was estimated at £4m.

Dr Clare Highton, from the City and Hackney clinical commissioning group (CCG) said: “Public health, specialist and CCG commissioners should take note of these important results showing the value for money of screening for HIV in primary care.

“This intervention means that people with HIV are able to live longer and healthier lives and the spread of infection to other people is halted.”

The findings appear in the medical journal the Lancet HIV.

Dr Michael Brady, medical director of the HIV/Aids charity the Terrence Higgins Trust, said the research was important and showed the approach to be cost-effective and possibly cost-saving.

“Undiagnosed HIV infection puts individuals at risk of preventable illness and death, disproportionately contributes to onward transmission and is an unnecessary burden of cost to the NHS,” he said.

“Effective HIV therapy means people can now expect to live a normal lifespan and won’t pass the virus on to anyone else. But testing and early treatment is essential to be able to benefit from this.

“We urgently need new approaches to HIV testing that are delivered at scale and targeted at those at risk.

“Testing in general practice is a key component of this because, while people living with undiagnosed HIV are not accessing existing HIV testing services, they do visit their GP and there are many missed opportunities to test.”

Brady said the UK’s national HIV testing guidance had been recommending testing in general practices in high-prevalence areas since 2008, with Nice guidelines also recommending the same.

“I hope that policymakers, commissioners and healthcare providers act on these findings and invest in HIV testing in primary care,” he said.

“We have the tools to end HIV transmission in the UK but we won’t achieve that without scaling up testing in general practice and other community settings.”

More on this story

More on this story

  • The 'elite controllers' who can naturally suppress HIV

  • Former health secretary Norman Fowler: ‘Some said those with HIV should be in isolation. Perpetually’

  • Covid fightback: the critical role of HIV experts

  • Today in Focus
    It's a Sin: a nurse reflects on the Aids crisis of the 80s

  • ‘We were so scared’: Four people who faced the horror of Aids in the 80s

  • 'Vaccine nationalism' echoes the disastrous mistakes made with HIV

  • Russell T Davies: ‘I looked away for years. Finally, I have put Aids at the centre of a drama’

  • 'The Aids epidemic is not yet over': inside a project with a vital message

  • Second person cleared of HIV remains free of virus one year on

Most viewed

Most viewed