Co-administration of dolutegravir-based treatment and short course of rifapentine/isoniazid (3HP) well tolerated in people living with HIV

Kelly Dooley at CROI 2019. Photo by Liz Highleyman.
Carole Leach-Lemens
Published: 12 March 2019

Co-administration of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy and short course (12 weeks) of rifapentine/isoniazid (3HP) for people living with HIV needing preventative treatment for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection was well tolerated with no adverse reactions, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2019) heard last week in Seattle.

Dr Kelly Dooley, presenting on behalf of the DOLPHIN study team, said that all 60 participants maintained viral suppression throughout 3HP/dolutegravir treatment in this single-arm phase I/II safety and pharmacokinetics (PK: drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination from the body) study, conducted in South Africa.

In Summer 2018 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended dolutegravir as the preferred first-line treatment for treatment-naïve people living with HIV. 

WHO has also given updated guidance for preventative therapy of latent TB infection.Twelve once-weekly doses of 3HP are now recommended as an alternative to six months of isoniazid for TB prevention in countries with high TB incidence.

This could transform the prevention of TB. However, drug interactions with antiretrovirals could make implementation difficult, as dolutegravir is metabolised by CYP3A and UGT1a1. These are enzymes induced by rifamycin antibiotics including rifapentine. This means when used together effective concentrations of dolutegravir may be reduced.

A previous trial to see how dolutegravir should be dosed involving four healthy HIV-negative volunteers showed, unsurprisingly, a slight reduction in dolutegravir concentrations. However, two experienced adverse events including high fever, hypertension and increased liver function enzymes so the study was stopped early.

Both dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy and 3HP have advantages. The question, Dr Dooley said, is can they be given together safely in people living with HIV needing latent TB treatment? If so, what is the right dolutegravir dose?

Sixty HIV-positive adults with undetectable viral load on an efavirenz-based regimen were enrolled. At the time of enrolment all were switched from efavirenz to dolutegravir + tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for a period of eight weeks to allow for efavirenz to washout.

They then received dolutegravir (50mg once a day) + tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) plus a weekly dose of 3HP (900mg/900mg) for 12 weeks. After 3HP completion all participants were followed for four more weeks. All had access to dolutegravir for 12 months after treatment.

Viral loads were measured at baseline (dolutegravir alone), week 11 (dolutegravir+3HP) and week 24 (one month after 3HP completion).

Thirty participants had semi-intensive PK sampling: dolutegravir alone (week 8), dolutegravir after the third 3HP dose (week 11) and dolutegravir after the eighth 3HP dose (week 16). Three interim analyses looking at PK and safety and to decide doses to be used were performed. The other thirty participants had sparse PK sampling.

The primary objectives were to look at the effect of rifapentine and isoniazid at doses of 900mg once weekly on the PK of dolutegravir, and to evaluate the safety of dolutegravir taken with 3HP. Secondary objectives included viral load suppression.

Of the 60 participants 70% were female with a median age of 40 years. All were of black ethnicity having a baseline median CD4 cell count of 683 cells/mm3. Fifty-four per cent tested positive with the QuantiFERON Gold in Tube test (a test to detect latent TB infection and TB disease).

The drugs were well tolerated with no grade 3 or higher clinical or laboratory adverse events that were related to 3HP.

All participants completed all 12 doses of 3HP.

HIV viral loads remained < 40 copies/ml throughout for all participants. Although one participant had a viral load of 2300 copies/ml at week 24 (four weeks after 3HP completion), following adherence counselling viral load returned to < 40 copies/ml.

One woman taking oral contraceptives became pregnant at week 24. Dr Dooley suggested barrier contraception for women taking rifampicin-containing TB prophylaxis, because of possible harm to foetal development.

Dolutegravir trough concentrations (the lowest concentration of the drug in the blood measured after a dose) were reduced by approximately 50%. The area under the curve (AUC: the overall amount of drug in the bloodstream after a dose) was reduced by approximately 30% with 3HP. However, median values were above the target value of 300 ng/ml at all time points.

According to pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis (how PK/PD together influence dosing, benefits and adverse effects) the average trough concentration with a 10mg once daily dose given as monotherapy is 300 ng/ml, which is equivalent to a once-daily dose of 50mg as part of combination therapy.

Dr Dooley concluded the findings reassuring, highlighting the importance of testing tolerability and safety in patients in whom clinicians hope to use the therapy.


Dooley KE et al. Safety & PK of weekly rifapentine/isoniazid (3HP) in adults with HIV on dolutegravir. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Seattle, abstract 80LB, 2019.

View the abstract on the conference website.

Watch the webcast of this presentation on the conference website.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.