Daily cotrimoxazole treatment significantly reduced malaria
parasitaemia and anaemia in pregnant women with HIV infection when compared to
intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, a study in Malawi has
found.
The findings are published in advance online by the Journal of Infectious Diseases, and the
study was carried out by researchers associated with the Malawi-Liverpool
Wellcome Clinical Research Programme and Médècins sans Frontières, with support
from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
Cotrimoxazole, a cheap antibiotic that is widely available
as an essential medicine in regions affected by malaria, is recommended as a
prophylaxis against bacterial infections and against pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia in HIV-infected people.
Cotrimoxazole has also been shown to have a protective
effect against malaria, which is a major cause of illness and death in pregnant
women (and in their offspring, who may acquire placental malaria if their
mother suffers an attack of malaria during pregnancy).
Women with HIV have greater vulnerability to developing
clinical malaria during pregnancy than other women, and have a higher risk of
developing anaemia, particularly more severe forms of anaemia. Infants of
mothers with HIV who developed malaria are also more likely to have a low
birth-weight. (Ter Kuile). There is conflicting evidence about the extent to which malaria during pregnancy increases the risk of mother-to-child HIV transmission.
For women without HIV infection, the standard way of
preventing malaria during pregnancy is to take intermittent therapy with
sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).
However the World Health Organization does not recommend SP
for pregnant women with HIV already taking cotrimoxazole due to an increased
risk of sulpha drug adverse reactions (both drugs are sulphonamide-type
antibiotics).
Although cotrimoxazole is known to protect against malaria
in adults and children with HIV, its efficacy and safety for malaria prevention
in pregnant women with HIV have not been established.
The study conducted in Malawi was a cross-sectional
analysis of responses to cotrimoxazole or SP in pregnant women with HIV. Women
had not been randomised; the cross-sectional analysis arose from confusion
amongst medical staff at one hospital over the implementation of new government
guidelines recommending cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for pregnant women with HIV
in 2007. Prior to this time, pregnant women had received intermittent SP.
Researchers were thus able to compare two groups of women
who received different treatment, sampled at the same time in another
cross-sectional study evaluating the effect of iron supplementation in
HIV-infected pregnant women on maternal illness. The study sampled women
attending the hospital’s antenatal service who were at least 34 weeks pregnant.
Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study the outcomes
evaluated were laboratory markers rather than malarial morbidity. The study
evaluated malarial parasitaemia and anaemia.
The study recruited 1142 pregnant women with a median age of
27 years and median CD4 cell count of 427 cells/mm3. Sixty per cent
were using bed nets to reduce the risk of mosquito bites (insecticide-treated
bed nets are recommended for all pregnant women in Malawi).
48.5% were already receiving antiretroviral therapy
according to Malawi’s
national treatment guidelines, which recommended treatment for all pregnant
women with WHO stages 3 or 4 HIV disease, or with CD4 cells counts below 250
cells/mm3.
Data were available on cotrimoxazole and SP usage for 98.2%
of women, of whom 49.7% received intermittent SP (three doses) only), 29.8%
received cotrimoxazole only, and 15.4% received cotrimoxazole and intermittent
SP. Five per cent received no prophylaxis.
The investigators found that after adjusting for age, CD4
count bed net use, number of antenatal visits and number of pregnancies, women
who received cotrimoxazole were significantly less likely to have malaria
parasitaemia (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.19 – 0.97), as were
those who received both cotrimoxazole and intermittent SP (OR 0.09, 95% CI
0.01-0.66), when compared to those who received intermittent SP alone.
Prevalence of parasitaemia was also lower in women who took
cotrimoxazole for more than 30 days (p=0.002).
Similarly, women who received cotrimoxazole were
significantly less likely to have anaemia (haemoglobin < 11g/dL)
(cotrimoxazole alone OR 0.67, cotrimoxazole and SP OR 0.72). The prevalence of
anaemia was not affected by the duration of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, although
haemoglobain concentrations were significantly lower in women who took
cotrimoxazole for less than 30 days when compared to women who took the drug for
more than 60 days. This is despite the fact that both cotrimoxazole and SP can
increase the risk of anaemia.
The investigators suggest that cotrimoxazole may have proved
more effective in preventing malaria because of the greater frequency of
dosing.
They note that one limitation of the study is that it
recruited only women in the third trimester of pregnancy, and relied on
self-report of drug exposure to assess the effectiveness of treatment.
“Our study demonstrated the challenges that resource-limited
countries such as Malawi
face when changing drug policies. Proper planning and timely training of health
personnel should always precede implementation, especially in settings where
frequent policy changes do take place,” the investigators write.
The authors say that a randomised trial should be conducted to
evaluate whether cotrimoxazole and SP are more effective than cotrimoxazole
alone in preventing malaria in pregnant women with HIV.