Effectiveness

The effectiveness of enfuvirtide was demonstrated in the pivotal TORO 1 and 2 studies of nearly 2000 persons. In both studies, intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly greater reductions in viral load among those taking T-20.1 2

An analysis showed that 67% of people who had a viral load below 100,000 copies/ml, a CD4 cell count above 100 cells/mm3, had previously used ten or fewer drugs, and had two or more active drugs in their background regimen were able to achieve viral suppression below 400 copies/ml at 48 weeks. 3

Adding T-20 to an effective background regimen produces the strongest and most enduring virological response. A recent analysis has shown that even adding T-20 to a background regimen consisting of drugs to which the patient is resistant reduced viral loads in the first four weeks of the study.

More than 1000 patients with advanced disease and resistance to the three older drug classes were randomly assigned to receive an optimised background regimen with or without T-20 in the TORO-1 and 2 studies. After 24 weeks, viral load decreased by an average of 1.4 to 1.7 logs in the T-20 group compared with 0.6 to 0.8 logs in the optimised background only arm. About 60% in the T-20 arm and 30% in the control arm attained a viral load below 400 copies/ml. CD4 cell gains were about twice as large in the T-20 arms.1,4

By 48 weeks, one-quarter of people in the T-20 group and more than three-quarters in the control group had dropped out of the two studies. While only 30% in the T-20 arm achieved viral suppression below 400 copies/ml and 18% below 50 copies/ml, this was still more than twice as high as the response rates in the control arm.5

After one year, people who took T-20 in addition to an optimised regimen were more likely to have a significant reduction in viral load and undetectable viral load, as well as a greater increase in CD4 cell counts and longer mean survival. By 96 weeks, 55% were still taking T-20. About a quarter of those initially assigned to the T-20 group had a viral load below 400 copies/ml, though this rose to about 50% when considering only those who stayed on treatment.6 Recent data have also shown that T-20 is still effective in around a quarter of patients at two years’ follow-up.7

References

  1. Lalezari JP et al. Enfuvirtide, an HIV-1 fusion inhibitor, for drug-resistant HIV infection in North and South America. N Engl J Med 348: 2175-2185, 2003
  2. Clotet B et al. Enfuvirtide (T-20) in combination with an optimized background (OB) regimen vs. OB alone in patients with prior experience or resistance to each of the three classes of approved antiretrovirals in Europe and Australia (TORO 2). 14th International AIDS Conference, Barcelona, abstract LbOr19A, 2002
  3. Montaner J et al. Prognostic staging of extensively pretreated patients with advanced HIV-1 disease. HIV Clin Trials 6: 281-290, 2005
  4. Lazzarin A et al. Efficacy of enfuvirtide in patients infected with drug-resistant HIV-1 in Europe and Australia. N Engl J Med 348: 2186-2195, 2003
  5. Nelson M et al. Durable efficacy of enfuvirtide over 48 weeks in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients in the T-20 versus optimized background regimen only 1 and 2 clinical trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 40: 404-412, 2005
  6. Reynes J et al. TORO: ninety-six-week virologic and immunologic response and safety evaluation of enfuvirtide with an optimized background of antiretrovirals. AIDS Patient Care STDs 21: 533-543, 2007
  7. Aresteh K et al. TORO: 96 week virological and immunological response and safety evaluation of enfuvirtide with an optimized background regimen. 15th International AIDS Conference, Bangkok, abstract MoOrB1058, 2004
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.