HIV Drug Resistance Workshop: prevention of mother to child transmission

Yasmin Halima
Published: 29 June 2004

A number of studies of the prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) now appear to point to an ominous conclusion: single-dose nevirapine (NVP) may not be the prophylactic panacea for the developing world.

Whilst single-dose NVP has been successful in limiting transmission rates of HIV as proven by the HIV-NET 012 trial, the emergence of resistance mutations after a single dose of NVP due to its long half-life is raising increasing alarm.

NNRTI-associated mutations have been shown to persist for over one year and exposure to short-course NVP has been shown to compromise virologic response to treatment in Thai women who begin treatment less than six months after giving birth.

Emergence of resistance in non-B HIV subtypes

Since a majority of the women likely to be treated in this context will have non-clade B virus, research has been focused on the consideration of resistance evolution in the different subtypes.

In a sub-study from HIV-NET 012, Susan Eshleman from Johns Hopkins reported on the incidence of resistance in women with HIV subtype A or D , in particular the emergence and decay of the Y181C and K103N mutations. The study found that in a subset of 140 women with subtypes A and D, the rate of NVP resistance increased from seven days to six to eight weeks. NVP resistance was similar at day 7 but at weeks 6 or 8 was higher in patients with subtype D. In women with A type virus, the Y181C was more difficult to detect over time compared to women who had HIV-1 subtype D. They also accumulated higher rates of the K103N mutation. This study confirms that there is a correlation between subtype and the selection and decay of NVP related resistance following single-dose NVP (Eshleman).

This finding is supported by findings from other trials such as data reported at last year’s workshop by David Katzenstein from Stanford, from the HPTN 023 Study of C infected women receiving single-dose nevirapine. The trial described the emergence of both Y181C and K103N at 2 weeks post-partum and the persistence of K103N which continued through to week 8 in this study (Kantor R et al. Rapid flux in NNRTI resistance mutations among subtype C HIV-1 infected women after single dose nevirapine, abstract 85, 2003).

Another interesting PMTCT study from ANRS (Ditrame Plus ANRS 1202/02) in Cote d’Ivoire considered the pharmacokinetic properties of NVP and its impact on resistance. This open-label randomised trial involved administration of AZT (300mg bid) at 36 or more weeks of gestation followed by a single oral dose of AZT (600mg) and nevirapine (200mg) just before start of labour. Babies were treated for one week with AZT syrup and one single dose of NVP syrup. Of the 381 women in the study, the transmission rate at week 6 post-partum was 6.4%.

33% of the 74 women enrolled in the substudy developed NVP-related resistance at week 4 and 23% of children had resistance at the same time point. Plasma and DNA-PBMC samples collected at week 4 showed that 15 out of 20 women sampled (75%) had resistance to NVP, but at 12 months after delivery three women did not show detectable mutations. In contrast, all six children had NVP resistance in plasma sampled at week 4 and had persistence of resistance at month 3 (1 child) and still at twelve months (1 child).

Plasma concentrations of NVP normalised to 48 hours post-partum revealed that NVP levels were lower in women who had not acquired NVP resistance compared to the mothers who did acquire resistance (598 ng/mL versus 851 ng/mL. The researchers conclude that NVP drug exposure has wide inter-patient variability and higher levels that persist over a prolonged period after delivery may account for the differing rates and persistence of resistance accumulation observed. Given that access to treatments remain atrociously scarce, these studies caution not so much against the use of NVP treatment, but the urgent need to explore more viable options that prevent transmission but do not compromise treatment during subsequent pregnancies or treatment for children (Chaix).

Read related reports from the XIII International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop, June 8-12, Tenerife, Spain

Take home messages

What were the key messages from this year's Resistance Workshop?

Entry and attachment inhibitors

As researchers learn more about the ways in which HIV develops resistance to entry and attachment inhibitors, the future shape of therapy with these new classes of drugs becomes clearer.

New concepts for the clinician

This year's workshop heard more about the clinical relevance of replication capacity and hypersusceptibility, and began to debate the potential therapeutic exploitation of interactions between resistance mutations.

Population surveys of resistance

What sort of resistance is occurring in clinic populations, and what does this tell us about clinical practice today?

Non-B HIV subtypes

As treatment access expands and the proportion of patients in Europe with non-B subtypes grows, understanding differences in resistance patterns between B and non-B HIV subtypes becomes more and more important.

References

Eshleman SH et al. Distinct patterns of selection and fading of K1-3N and Y181C are seen in women with subtype A vs D HIV-1 after single-dose nevirapine: HIV-NET 012. (Abstract 50) Antiviral Therapy 2004, 9:S59.

Chaix ML et al. Persistence of nevirapine-resistant virus and pharmacokinetic analysis in women who received intrapartum NVP associated to a short course of zidovudine (ZDV) to prevent perinatal HIV-1 transmission: the Ditrame Plus ANRS 1201/02 Study, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. (Abstract 160) Antiviral Therapy 2004, 9:S176.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.