Nucleic acid testing for HIV and HCV making US blood supply safer

Keith Alcorn
Published: 19 August 2004

State-of-the-art testing systems to screen donated blood have improved the safety of the US blood supply by preventing the transmission of potentially deadly viruses, according to a new study carried out by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), a component of the United States National Institutes of Health. Nucleic acid-amplification testing (NAT) has helped prevent the transmission of approximately five HIV-1 infections and 56 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections each year since it began being used in the United States as an investigational screening test in mid-1999. The study is published in the August 19th issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Risks to blood recipients from transfusion-transmitted viruses such as HIV and hepatitis are already extremely low, in part because of increased surveillance and improved testing," said Barbara Alving, M.D., NHLBI acting director. "NAT enhances the safety of the nation's blood supply by further reducing these risks."

In the United Kingdom nucleic acid testing is not used for screening donations to the National Blood Transfusion Service.

The NHLBI study is the first and only one of its scope to show the effectiveness of the NAT assay system nationally. All major blood donation laboratories in the United States participated, accounting for more than 98 percent of tested blood donations. Many organisations collaborated on the research, including the American Red Cross, Blood Systems Research Institute, America's Blood Centers, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The study investigators analysed all donations that detected ribonucleic acid (RNA) from HIV-1 and HCV by NAT between 1999 and 2002. The researchers then looked to see which of these infected donations had been missed by tests to detect viral antibodies or antigens (proteins from the virus), the types of screening previously used. They concluded that NAT reduced the risk of HIV-1 and HCV infections associated with blood transfusion to approximately 1 in 2 million blood units. In comparison, other blood screening tests are associated with rates of 1 in 1.5 million for HIV-1 and 1 in 276,000 for HCV.

Blood donors in the United States have been tested for evidence of HIV infection since 1985 and for evidence of HCV infection since 1990. Although increasingly sensitive tests to detect HIV and HCV antibodies and HIV antigen were implemented during the past decade, in rare instances infections in donors have been missed. This is due to the "window period" during which a donor can be infected but still test negative on screening tests.

The NAT system, which was approved for use in 2002 by the FDA, can detect HIV and HCV infections in blood donors earlier than other screening tests because it detects viral genes rather than antibodies or antigens. The appearance of antibodies requires time for the donor to develop an immune response, and detection of antigens requires time for a higher level of virus to appear in the bloodstream.

With the use of NAT for HCV, the window period is reduced by approximately 60 days (from an average of 70 days to 10 days). For HIV-1, the average window period with antibody is approximately 22 days. This is reduced to approximately 11 days with the NAT tests used in this study. The use of NAT has allowed blood banks to discontinue two less effective screening tests - HIV-1 antigen testing and a test for a nonspecific marker for HCV. Blood donations continue to be screened with antibody tests for HIV, HCV, and other viruses, which helps ensure the safety of the blood supply.

One of the NAT systems used in the study was first developed in the mid-1990s by Gen-Probe Incorporated, in collaboration with Chiron Corporation, with support for research and development provided by NHLBI. Results of screening by the NAT system manufactured by Roche Molecular Systems were also included in the study.

Reference

Stramer SL et al. Detection of HIV-1 and HCV donations among antibody-negative blood donors by nucleic-acid amplification testing. N Engl J Med 351: 760-768, 2004.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.