Prednisone reduces the risk of developing TB-IRIS after starting antiretroviral treatment

Graeme Meintjes at CROI 2017. Photo by Liz Highleyman,
Keith Alcorn
Published: 20 February 2017

Prednisone reduces the risk of an immune restoration inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in people with HIV after starting tuberculosis (TB) treatment, a randomised trial called PredART has found. The results were presented last week at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2017) in Seattle, by Dr Graeme Meintjes of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

TB-related IRIS is a frequent complication in people with HIV who start TB treatment with low CD4 cell counts. TB-IRIS occurs when the revival of the immune system due to antiretroviral treatment causes it to react to TB mycobacteria, often with severe effects. Inflammatory symptoms such as severely swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy), fever and paradoxical worsening of TB symptoms can emerge, and may require hospitalisation.

A meta-analysis of cohort studies has shown that TB-IRIS develops in around one in five HIV-positive people with TB after starting antiretroviral treatment, and whilst the death rate is low (2%), approximately one-quarter of all people who develop TB-IRIS must be admitted to hospital for treatment.

Although it is known that its symptoms can be treated with the corticosteroid prednisone, prevention of TB-IRIS has until now depended on starting TB treatment before antiretroviral therapy, in order to reduce the bacterial load before immune reconstitution begins to take place. People starting treatment with low CD4 cell counts (< 50 cells/mm3), those with disseminated TB (symptoms in organs other than the lungs) and those who experience very large CD4 cell count increases after starting treatment are known to have a higher risk of developing TB-IRIS.

To test whether TB-IRIS can be prevented by use of prednisone, investigators conducted a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in people at high risk of developing TB-IRIS. People were eligible to take part in the study if they had CD4 cell counts below 100 cells/mm3, had started TB treatment less than 30 days prior to joining the study and were antiretroviral-naïve. People with rifampicin resistance, anyone not taking standard first-line TB treatment and people with symptoms of neurological TB were excluded from the study, as were people with a poor clinical response to TB treatment. People with Kaposi’s sarcoma were also excluded because prednisone may exacerbate KS.

Everyone entering the study began antiretroviral therapy, and was randomised to receive either 40mg/kg per day of prednisone for two weeks, followed by 20mg/kg per day for two weeks, or placebo. The primary endpoint of the study was the development of TB-IRIS during the four-week treatment period and the 12-week follow-up period.

Two hundred and forty people were randomised to begin treatment in the study; 106 completed treatment and week 12 follow-up in the prednisone arm and 107 in the placebo arm. Five people in the prednisone arm and four people in the placebo arm died during the study, and nine in each arm were lost to follow-up.

The study participants had very advanced HIV disease; the median CD4 cell count on study entry was 49 cells/mm3 in the prednisone arm and 51 in the placebo arm and viral loads were high (5.5 log and 5.4 log respectively). Participants began antiretroviral treatment a median of 17 days after TB treatment.

The cumulative incidence of TB-IRIS was 46.7% in the placebo group and 32.5% in the prednisone arm, a risk reduction of 30% (relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96). There was also a small but significant delay in the onset of TB-IRIS in the prednisone arm (10 days versus 8 days in the placebo arm, p = 0.002).

Significantly more people who developed TB-IRIS in the placebo arm required corticosteroid treatment to manage their symptoms when compared to the prednisone arm (28.3% vs 13.3%, RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.83), a potential indication that prednisone moderated the severity of TB-IRIS symptoms even if it did develop. However, people in the placebo group were no more likely than people in the prednisone group to be hospitalised for TB-IRIS (7.5% vs 4.2%, p = 0.41).

Adverse events leading to a change in TB or antiretroviral medication occurred more frequently in the placebo group (15.8% vs 8.3%) but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07), although grade 3 adverse events did occur significantly more often in the placebo arm (45.4% vs 29.4, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 laboratory adverse events, nor in viral load or CD4 changes at the end of the study. CD4 cell counts increased by 150 cells/mm3 in the placebo arm and 164 cells/mm3 in the prednisone arm, showing that the corticosteroid did not impede immune reconstitution.

As a corticosteroid, prednisone might increase the risk of bacterial infections, but these were not seen more frequently in the prednisone arm. The most common AIDS-defining or bacterial events in study participants were oral candidiasis (10) and pneumonia (7). One new case of Kaposi’s sarcoma occurred, in the placebo arm, in an individual who discontinued antiretroviral therapy after 20 weeks on treatment.

Although it did not eliminate TB-IRIS entirely in this high-risk population, prednisone as a preventive treatment did significantly reduce its incidence and also reduced the need for prednisone treatment of TB-IRIS symptoms, Dr Meintjes concluded.


Meintjes G et al. Randomised controlled trial of prednisone for the prevention of paradoxical TB-IRIS. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2017), Seattle, abstract 81LB, 2017.

View the abstract on the conference website.

View a webcast of this presentation on the conference website.

Watch a video on the PredART trial.

NAM's coverage of CROI 2017 has been made possible thanks to support from Janssen and ViiV Healthcare.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.