Routine clinical use of DAAs highly effective and safe in people with HIV/HCV in Europe

Michael Carter
Published: 19 April 2018

“Real life” data from across Europe shows that direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) cure hepatitis C in the vast majority of people with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection who receive treatment, according to research presented at the 2018 International Liver Congress in Paris. Only a small number of people stopped treatment because of side-effects, most of which were related to ribavirin. A cure was observed in 92.5% of people with sustained virological response (SVR) data. Outcomes were similar across Europe.

“In a diverse population of HIV/HCV co-infected patients from all regions in Europe, DAA therapy resulted in an overall SVR rate of 92.5% which is similar to what has been shown for national cohorts in Western Europe,” write the investigators. “There were no significant differences in response across regions, although with limited power in Central East and Eastern Europe, and further follow-up is warranted to confirm these findings.”

Results from clinical trials show that DAAs are highly effective and safe in people with HIV/HCV co-infection. However, European data on outcomes when DAAs are used in routine clinical care are largely lacking.

Investigators from the EuroSIDA collaboration designed a prospective study involving 632 adults with co-infection who started DAA therapy between June 2014 and March 2017. Information was collected on treatment response, discontinuations due to toxicity and side-effects.

The study participants had a median age of 51 years, 79% were men, 58% had a history of injecting drug use and a third had liver cirrhosis. HIV infection was well controlled: 99% had an HIV viral load below 500 copies/ml and the median CD4 cell count was 600 cells/mm3.

The most commonly used HCV regimens were sofosbuvir and ledipasvir with or without ribavirin (46%) and sofosbuvir with daclatasvir with or without ribavirin (20%).

SVR data were available for 468 people – approximately two-thirds of the cohort – and 93% of these individuals attained SVR.

SVR status was unknown in 164 people, but 50% of these individuals had an undetectable HCV viral load at the end of therapy, the other 50% of individuals having an unknown treatment response. People with unknown SVR status were slightly more likely to be located in Central East and Eastern Europe (p = 0.059).

The only factors associated with increased chances of SVR were white vs non-white race, less advanced fibrosis (stage 0-1 vs stage 2-4) and longer duration of therapy.

At least one drug was stopped early by 5% of people. Reasons included toxicity (n = 11), viral failure (n = 11), physician choice (n = 3), drug stock-out (n = 1), substance abuse (n = 1) and other/unknown (n = 14).

The median duration of therapy was nine weeks for people who interrupted therapy because of toxicity compared to 12 weeks for people who did not experience any toxicity-related interruptions.

Nine out of the eleven toxicity-related discontinuations were related to well-known ribavirin-related side-effects.

“A quarter of all persons who completed treatment did not have a follow-up HCV-RNA to determine SVR12. This could reflect other follow-up schedules than what is seen in clinical trials; treatment outside the HIV clinic, loss to follow-up or data not reported and requires further data to clarify,” conclude the researchers. “Only 5% stopped one or more HCV drugs earlier than scheduled, and a third of these were due to toxicity mostly related to well-known adverse effects of ribavirin. We saw no new safety signals for DAAs.”


Peters L et a. Efficacy and safety of IFN-free DAA HCV therapy in HIV/HCV co-infected persons: results from a pan-European study. The International Liver Congress, Paris, abstract THU-309, 2018. Journal of Hepatology 68: S268, 2018.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.