Switching from first-line ART with suppressed viral load linked to treatment failure

Marina Klein, of McGill University in Montreal, speaking at AIDS 2014. Photo: International AIDS Society/Steve Forrest.
Published: 29 July 2014

People who switch away from their initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen when their viral load is undetectable may have a higher likelihood of subsequent virological failure, researchers reported at the 20th International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2014) last week, in Melbourne. However, the association varied across groups and the researchers suggested their findings may reflect issues such as adherence or treatment changes due to pregnancy.

Experts recommend starting HIV treatment with a maximally potent combination antiretroviral regimen, especially for people with high viral load. But even in the modern ART era many people wish to switch regimens for the sake of better tolerability or simplicity. Prior studies indicate that about 40% of people modify their first regimen.

Marina Klein of McGill University in Montreal and colleagues evaluated why people switch first-line regimens for reasons other than inadequate viral suppression – for example, to reduce side-effects or improve convenience – and the link between switching and subsequent virologic failure. Suppressed viral load was defined as two HIV RNA measurements below 50 copies/ml at least one month apart; virological failure was defined as viral load above 1000 copies/ml.

This analysis looked at 2807 people living with HIV in the multi-site Canadian CANOC cohort who started combination ART between 2005 and 2012. Most (87%) were men and the median age was 42 years. The median baseline CD4 cell count was 260 cells/mm3, 12% had a history of injecting drugs and 15% had hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection.

Overall, a total of 1003 participants (36%) switched from their first-line ART regimen. Among these, 391 people (14%) switched once while 612 (22%) switched two or more times. The median time from treatment initiation to the first switch was approximately 10 months and the median CD4 count when switching was 450 cells/mm3, showing substantial immune recovery since starting treatment. Participants were more likely to switch away from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens.

Looking at characteristics associated with switching, women were more likely than men to change their regimen. Women made up 11% of people who never switched, 14% of those who switched once and 18% of those who switched multiple times. Older people, people who injected drugs and people with HIV and HCV co-infection were also somewhat more likely to switch two or more times, as were those with lower CD4 counts.

However, in a multivariate analysis controlling for other factors, the only significant predictors of switching were sex, with men being about half as likely to switch multiple times (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.53); age, with older people less likely to switch once (adjusted OR 0.88); and province of residence, with those in Ontario and Quebec being more likely to make a first switch.

In addition, people who started ART after 2008 – when more tolerable drugs were available – were about 30% less likely to switch multiple times (adjusted OR 0.69), and those who had been on their first regimen longer were more likely to subsequently switch (adjusted OR 1.45 for one switch, 1.72 for multiple switches).

Another statistical analysis found that switching regimens was associated with a 35% increased risk of virological failure overall (adjusted OR 1.35). However, when looking at specific characteristics, the difference was significant only for men, who had a 65% lower risk of virological failure (adjusted OR 0.35), and people who inject drugs, who were nearly three times more likely to experience treatment failure (adjusted OR 2.85).

"Even with modern ART, regimen switch while virologically suppressed was common," with changes presumably due to tolerability, simplification or to avoid drug interactions, Klein and her colleagues summarised. "Switching from first ART regimen while virologically suppressed was associated with subsequent virologic failure."

Switching ART due to tolerability concerns "might represent specific patient characteristics where ART intolerance is a marker for factors associated with poor adherence" they suggested. They added that the greater likelihood of women switching regimens and experiencing subsequent virological failure might reflect changes in treatment related to pregnancy.

However, they noted that this analysis did not actually identify specific reasons for switching or assess the role of adherence. Development of drug resistance has not yet been assessed.

"Regimen switching while virologically suppressed may not be completely benign," the researchers concluded. "Closer follow up among patients switching for non-virologic reasons may be warranted as such switches may serve as a marker for problems with adherence or poorer tolerance of medications."


Hull M et al. (Klein MB presenting) Switching from first antiretroviral therapy regimen while virologically suppressed is associated with increased risk of subsequent virologic failure. 20th International AIDS Conference, abstract TUAB0103, Melbourne, 2014.

View the study abstract on the conference website.

NAM’s AIDS 2014 bulletins have been made possible thanks to support from Bristol-Myers Squibb. NAM's wider conference news reporting services have been supported by AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen and ViiV Healthcare’s Positive Action Programme.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.