Taking it

The standard adult dose of Kaletra is two tablets (each containing 200mg lopinavir/50mg ritonavir) twice daily. An oral solution containing 80mg/ml LPV and 20mg/ml RTV is available and generally dosed twice daily. Each dose of 5ml contains 400mg LPV/100mg RTV. The oral solution contains 42% alcohol, needs to be refrigerated, and should be taken with food.

In 2009, The European Medicines Agency approved once-daily dosing of Kaletra in a co-formulation (800mg/200mg) for patients new to HIV treatment. According to a press release from its manufacturer Abbott, Kaletra dosed once daily may be associated with a lesser sustainability of virologic suppression and a higher risk of diarrhoea compared to the recommended standard twice-daily dosage.1

Once-daily dosing of Kaletra was approved in the US for treatment-naive adults in April 2010 for patients with less than three lopinavir-associated resistance mutations.2

The 48-week results from the MO6-802 study showed that in treatment-experienced patients, there was no significant difference in viral load suppression or side-effects between patients who took the drug once or twice daily.3 

A particular concern in once-daily dosing is the risk of lopinavir levels falling to low levels between once-daily doses. This occurred in six of 20 patients in one study and only dose escalation was able to resolve the problem in one patient.4

A later 48-week long ACTG 5073 study (AIDS Clinical Trials Group) found no difference in the probability of achieving sustained virological response between the once-daily and twice-daily arms of the study. However, in those who entered the study with a higher viral load, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving twice-daily therapy achieved a sustained response than did patients taking Kaletra once daily.5

In the ARTEMIS study, another 48-week study reported on in 2007, more patients in the twice-daily lopinavir/r arm achieved a viral load less than 50 copies/ml than did those on once-daily dosing. Additionally, participants in the once-daily dosing arm experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events and diarrhoea.6

However, the MO5-739 study looking at dosing frequency found that at 48-weeks, Kaletra tablets dosed once daily were no less safe and effective than twice-daily dosing. Each study arm received Kaletra in combination with Truvada and after a year, an equal number of patients in both study arms had undetectable viral load and comparable CD4 cell count increases. In this study, once-daily Kaletra did not increase the risk of side-effects (including diarrhoea).7 

Kaletra was originally available in capsules containing 133mg LPV/33.3mg RTV, with a standard dose being three capsules twice a day. Lopinavir/ritonavir in capsule and oral solution form was approved by the US FDA in 2000 for use with other antiretrovirals in the treatment of adults and children 6 months of age or older. Marketing approval in the EU followed soon after. The film-coated tablet was approved in the US in 2005 and in the European Union in 2006. In developing and middle-income countries, the tablets are marketed under the trade name Aluvia. Tablets cannot be crushed or split; they must be taken whole.

The tablet formulation produces equivalent exposure and maximal blood concentrations of both drugs to the capsules. It also carries a lower risk of causing extreme peaks and troughs in blood drug levels.8

The approval of a low-dose tablet (100mg lopinavir/25mg ritonavir) in both the EU and the US should make it easier for patients on non-standard dosing schedules to achieve the correct blood levels of both drugs.

Caution should be exercised in patients with hepatitis C co-infection, as mild to moderate hepatic impairment can increase blood levels of lopinavir by 30%.

References

  1. Gazzard BG, BHIVA Treatment Guidelines Writing Group British HIV Association Guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-infected adults with antiretroviral therapy 2008. HIV Med 9(8): 563-608. Available online at www.bhiva.org, 2008
  2. Eron JJ et al. Once-daily versus twice-daily lopinavir / ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 48-week randomised trial. J Infect Dis 189: 265-272, 2004
  3. Zajdenverg R et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir tablets administered once- or twice-daily with NRTIs in antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1 infected subjects: results of a 48-week randomized trial (Study M06-802). Fifth IAS Conference on HIV Treatment, Pathogenesis and Prevention, abstract TuAb104, 2009
  4. La Porte CJL et al. Pharmacokinetics of once-daily lopinavir / ritonavir and the influence of dose modification. AIDS 19: 1105-1107, 2005
  5. Mildvan D et al. Randomized comparison in treatment-naive patients of once-daily vs twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART and comparison of once-daily self-administered vs directly observed therapy. Fourteenth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Los Angeles, abstract 138, 2007
  6. Clumeck N et al. ARTEMIS: efficacy and safety of lopinavir (BID vs QD) and darunavir (QD) in antiretroviral-naive patients. Eleventh European AIDS Conference, Madrid, abstract LBPS7/5, 2007
  7. Gathe J et al. Study M05-730 primary efficacy results at week 48: phase 3, randomized, open-label study of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets once daily versus twice daily, co-administered with tenofovir DF and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 infected subjects. Fifteenth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, Poster 775, 2008
  8. Awni W et al. Significantly reduced food effect and pharmacokinetic variability with a novel lopinavir / ritonavir tablet formulation. Third International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, Rio de Janeiro, abstract WeOa0206, 2005
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.