Twice-daily dosing of dolutegravir when
combined with the tuberculosis (TB) drug rifampicin is safe and effective and will allow
dolutegravir to be used alongside TB treatment as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), according to results of the
INSPIRING study presented on Monday at the 25th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2018) in Boston.
Dolutegravir is a potent HIV integrase
inhibitor with a high genetic barrier to resistance. It is recommended as an
alternative to efavirenz in first-line antiretroviral treatment in lower- and
middle-income countries and a fixed-dose combination pill containing
dolutegravir, tenofovir and lamivudine priced at $75 a year became available in
2017.
Although dolutegravir has few drug
interactions with other medicines in comparison with efavirenz – the drug
currently recommended as third agent in antiretroviral regimens in lower- and
middle-income countries – there is evidence from a pharmacokinetic study in
healthy volunteers to show that rifampicin reduces dolutegravir blood levels.
When dolutegravir received marketing
approval regulators recommended that the drug should be dosed twice daily if
used alongside rifampicin to overcome the drug interaction.
To provide evidence that this dosing
pattern is safe and effective, manufacturer ViiV Healthcare designed the
INSPIRING study.
The phase 3a,
randomised, open-label study recruited 113 participants, all of whom had been
taking rifampicin-based TB therapy for at least eight weeks and had a
CD4 cell count above 50 cells/mm3. The study recruited participants
in South Africa, Peru, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Argentina and Thailand.
The patients were
randomised on a 3:2 basis to receive an ART regimen based on either dolutegravir
(50mg twice daily for at least 24 weeks, then 50mg once daily) (n = 69) or efavirenz
(600mg once daily)(n = 44). Participants who received dolutegravir switched to
once-daily dosing at least two weeks after completing TB treatment to leave
sufficient time for the induction effect of rifampicin to cease.
In this 24-week
interim analysis, the investigators analysed the proportion of people with
viral suppression and the safety of the two ART regimens, including the
proportion of people experiencing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
(IRIS).
Median baseline
CD4 cell count and viral load were broadly comparable between the two study
arms (5.1 log10 copies/ml and 208 cells/mm3 in the
dolutegravir arm and 5.24 log10 copies/ml and 202 cells/mm3
in the efavirenz arm). The majority (60%) of people were men and
approximately two-thirds of participants were African.
After 24 weeks of
follow-up, viral load was undetectable in 81% of participants randomised to
dolutegravir-based therapy and 89% of those receiving efavirenz-based ART. The lower
rate of virological response in the dolutegravir arm was due to five discontinuations
unrelated to therapy, loss to follow-up and protocol deviations, and four cases
in which viral load had fallen below 400 copies at week 24 but had not fallen
below 50 copies/ml. In each of these cases viral load fell below 50 copies
during further follow-up.
CD4 cell increases
were comparable between the two regimens (median increase from baseline 146
cells/mm3 for dolutegravir vs 93 cells/mm3 for
efavirenz).
Only two people,
both of whom were in the efavirenz arm, stopped treatment because of adverse
events. There were no discontinuations due to liver-related side-effects.
The overall TB-IRIS
rate was low (6% for dolutegravir vs 9% for efavirenz) and there were no
treatment discontinuations due to TB-IRIS.
The study is
continuing, but on the basis of these interim results, the investigators
conclude that dolutegravir 50mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated in
HIV-positive people who are receiving rifampicin-based TB therapy.
“Rates of IRIS were low,” comment the researchers. “There were no new toxicity
signals for dolutegravir and no discontinuations due to liver events. These
data support the use of dolutegravir-based regimens in HIV/TB co-infection.”