Undetectable viral load at time of immunisation enhances yellow fever vaccine protection for people with HIV

Michael Carter
Published: 24 November 2017

Viral suppression at the time of immunisation is the most important determinant of long-term response to yellow fever vaccination among people with HIV, Swiss investigators report in Clinical Infectious Diseases. Every person with an undetectable viral load at the time of first yellow fever vaccination continued to have a protective response ten years after vaccination, they found.

“Persons infected with HIV demonstrated good short-term immune response to YFV [yellow fever vaccination], which decreased to 75% ten years p.v. [post vaccination],” comment the authors. “The long-term immune response of patients with HIV RNA suppressed at vaccination remained unimpaired for up to ten years.”

The investigators believe their findings have implications for vaccination strategies, writing: “HIV-infected patients mount a long-standing protective immune response to YFV up to at least ten years if they are vaccinated while remaining on successful cART [combination antiretroviral therapy]…until further data are available a single booster after ten years seems to be adequate to restimulate the vaccine response in the event of new travel to a YF [yellow fever] endemic area.”

Yellow fever is a mosquito-borne severe viral haemorrhagic disease. There is no antiviral treatment. However, there is a highly effective vaccine. The World Health Organization issued guidance in 2013 recommending that individuals should receive yellow fever vaccination boosters every ten years to obtain life-long protection against the disease.

Many HIV-positive individuals live in or travel to areas where yellow fever is endemic. The long-term response to yellow fever vaccination in people with HIV is poorly understood. Investigators from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study therefore identified 247 people with a documented first yellow fever vaccination after their diagnosis with HIV. Stored blood samples were examined to see if individuals had an immune response at one, five and ten years post-vaccination. A yellow fever plaque reduction neutralisation titre (PRNT) of 1: >10 was regarded as reactive and protective. Predictors of vaccine response were also examined.

The majority of people were from sub-Saharan Africa. Most (82%) were taking cART at baseline and 83% had an undetectable viral load (below 400 copies/ml). Median CD4 cell count was 536 cells/mm3.

Yellow fever vaccination is only recommended for asymptomatic HIV-positive people with a CD4 cell count above 200 cells/mm3. This is because it is a live-attenuated vaccine and therefore poses significant health risk for people with very weak immune systems. Despite this recommendation, the investigators identified eleven individuals who were immunised against yellow fever while their CD4 cell count was dangerously low.

Overall, PRNT was reactive in 46% of people before vaccination. A protective immune response was present one, five and ten years post-vaccination in 95%, 86% and 75% of people, respectively.

In people with suppressed viral load at the time of immunisation, the proportion with reactive PRNT remained consistently high: 99% at year one, 99% at year five and 100% at year ten.

An undetectable viral load at the time of vaccination was the single biggest determinant of long-term response to the vaccine.

The authors recommend that people with HIV should be vaccinated against yellow fever once their viral load is suppressed and that they should receive a booster after ten years if they remain on suppressive cART. However, people who were vaccinated while their viral load was detectable should either have their immune response to the vaccine measured or receive a booster vaccination, irrespective of the time since first yellow fever vaccination.


Veit O et al. Long-term immune response to yellow fever vaccination in HIV-infected individuals depends on HIV-RNA suppression status: implications for vaccination schedule. Clin Infect Dis, online edition, 2017.

Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.