United States guidelines

Published: 07 April 2009

The United States government announced new public health guidelines for the use of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in January 2005.1 The guidelines recommend treatment for people who seek PEP no more than 72 hours after a high-risk exposure, such as through unprotected sex or sharing injecting equipment.

Unlike the United Kingdom guidelines, the guidelines from the United States state that any triple-drug antiretroviral regimen approved by the Department of Health and Human Services may be used. They also suggest that a dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen may be sufficient, as there is no evidence for the increased effectiveness of an extra drug, particularly in the face of increased risk of side-effects.

Preferred regimens include efavirenz (Sustiva) with 3TC (lamivudine, Epivir); or FTC (emtricitabine, Emtriva) and AZT (zidovudine, Retrovir) or tenofovir (Viread); and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (Kaletra) with AZT and either 3TC or FTC. This may be modified if details of the source patient’s treatment history or resistance profile become available. The United States guidelines recommend the avoidance of efavirenz in women of childbearing age and nevirapine in general.

The United States guidelines recommend follow-up for at least six months following exposure to monitor for HIV infection, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, and/or drug toxicity when applicable.

While European and United States guidelines agree that treatment should be given for 28 days and when the source is known to be HIV-positive, they differ in situations where the source’s HIV status is unknown. European guidelines recommend treatment following unprotected receptive anal sex or following unprotected anal, vaginal or oral sex with ejaculation with a person from a group or an area of high HIV prevalence (more than 15%). If the source is not from a group or an area with a high HIV prevalence, PEP is only recommended following unprotected receptive anal sex.2 In contrast, the United States recommendations suggest that the decision to administer PEP be made on a case-by-case basis.

References

  1. Smith DK et al. Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 54: 1-20, 2005
  2. Blackham J et al. Differences between new United States recommendations and existing European guidelines on the use of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) following non-occupational exposure. Eurosurveillance Weekly 10: 3, 2005
This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.