Human papillomavirus (HPV)

Another sexually transmitted viral infection is now emerging as a possible co-factor in HIV transmission: the human papilloma virus (HPV), which can cause genital and anal warts.

In 2009, a study in gay men which found anal gonorrhoea multiplied the risk of acquiring HIV sevenfold, also found that men with anal warts were 3.63 times more likely to acquire HIV than men without them, even after adjusting for differences in sexual behaviour.1

The following year, a substudy of the first RCT of circumcision for HIV prevention at Orange Farm in South Africa found that infection with one or more of the cancer-causing subtypes of the human papilloma virus (HPV) multiplied the risk of acquiring HIV among young men 4.5-fold.2

The substudy collected swabs for DNA analysis from 1683 men and tested them for the presence of 13 of the high-risk, cancer-causing subtypes of HPV and 24 of the low-risk wart-forming ones. HPV samples were collected when the study terminated, 21 months after participants were circumcised.

The researchers investigated whether HPV prevalence was associated with a risk of seroconversion during the study and also whether seroconversion was associated with participants’ age, education level, number of sexual partners, condom use, and whether they had TB or other sexually transmitted infections including herpes, gonorrhoea and chlamydia.

During the trial, 2% of trial participants became infected with HIV, and 17.5% and 14.3% were infected with at least one low-risk or high-risk strain of HPV respectively. The most common types of high-risk HPV were type 16 (3.5%) and 18 (3.1%).

In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for the other factors listed above, participants with at least one strain of HPV were 4.6 times more likely to acquire HIV than participants without high-risk HPV.

This was associated exclusively with high-risk HPV infection. Participants with low-risk types of HPV were no more likely to acquire HIV than HPV-uninfected men (adjusted risk ratio 0.92), whereas men with high-risk HPV were four times more likely (adjusted risk ratio 3.8).

The likelihood of acquiring HIV increased dramatically in men with multiple subtypes of HPV. Auvert calculated that annual HIV incidence in men without HPV was less than 1%, 3 to 4% in men with one or two types, 10% in men with three types and 21% in men with five types. Each infection with an additional high-risk type of HPV increased the likelihood of HIV acquisition by two-thirds.

Auvert commented that one possible limitation of his study was that because HPV infection was determined at the end of the study, HIV infection might pre-date HPV infection. However, he commented that because HIV infections were by definition recent in this study, the men who caught HIV would not have suffered a significant amount of immune damage and should be no more vulnerable to HPV than average.

He quoted several other studies that found that high-risk HPV infection was associated with increased risk of HIV infection (relative risk ranging from 1.7 to 3.5). Auvert also presented another study in a poster at the conference which showed that there was a 3.4-fold higher risk of HIV infection in female sex workers with high-risk HPV infection.3

An audience member suggested that it might be worth funding a trial of one of the HPV vaccines as an HIV-prevention measure and Auvert hinted that he was in talks with possible funders.

References

  1. Jin F et al. Anal sexually transmitted infections and the risk of HIV infection in homosexual men. JAIDS 53(1):144-9, 2010
  2. Auvert B et al. Association of oncogenic and nononcogenic human papillomavirus with HIV incidence. JAIDS 53:111-116, 2010
  3. Auvert B et al. High risk HPV infection is associated with HIV acquisition among South African female sex workers. 5th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, Cape Town, abstract TUPEC073, 2009
This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.