Subtype C and mutations

There is a growing body of research into polymorphisms and resistance mutations seen in subtype C. Studies have reported a higher prevalence of certain secondary protease substitutions, such as K20R, M36I, M46 and I93L among people with subtype C who have never taken antiretroviral drugs.1 2

Subtype C-infected patients in Botswana who were on an NRTI backbone regimen of AZT/ddI used a different thymidine analogue resistance pathway (67N/70R/215Y) than did subtype C-infected patients in India, Malawi, or South Africa.3 

Subtype C, the predominant form of HIV-1 in southern Africa, is much more likely than other subtypes to develop the K65R resistance mutation. Development of K65R confers resistance to most of the nucleoside (NRTI) drugs except AZT. Further, although K65R is normally seen in patients failing tenofovir, abacavir, or ddI – it is also seen in subtype C patients on failing regimens containing d4T (stavudine).4

In subtype C patients in Botswana who failed first-line treatment on d4T/ddI paired with either nevirapine or efavirenz, incidence of the K65R mutation was high (30%).5 In Malawi, with an NRTI backbone of d4T/3TC plus nevirapine, incidence of the mutation was 23%.6 Occurrence of this mutation was much lower in other studies of subtype C patients in India, South Africa, and Israel.

Subtype C patients failing NNRTI therapy in Israel and India developed the G190A mutation that is not commonly found in subtype B or in therapy-naive patients with subtype C infection.7

A study of six Ethiopians also suggested that NNRTI-related resistance mutations may develop more rapidly in the subtype C virus and that people infected with this virus may have a greater chance of being naturally resistant to the NNRTIs.8

A retrospective case-control study evaluating 42 consecutive matched pairs of patients with subtype C and subtype B HIV infection found that people with subtype C had an inferior viral load response to treatment at 24 and 48 weeks, with high rates of secondary mutational changes in the protease and reverse transcriptase enzyme.9

This confirms several reports of the rapid development of drug resistance among women given nevirapine monotherapy to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission. There have also been reports of previously unreported mutations in the subtype C virus (103E, 106M, 62V, 75E) in response to efavirenz treatment. 10 8

An analysis of 40 subtype C South African blood samples that had not been exposed to HIV therapy showed that 90% contained polymorphisms M36I and I93L, which have been identified as secondary protease mutations. Nearly half showed the K20R mutation, the L63P/T/V mutation, and five of 40 samples had the V77I polymorphism. A quarter exhibited both K20R and M36I, associated with resistance to indinavir and ritonavir. Three samples showed the V82I polymorphism linked to low level resistance to nelfinavir.11

In 28 Zambians who were subtype C and antiretroviral-naive, an analysis found a high prevalence of polymorphisms.12 The most frequent secondary mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes were I93L, L89M, M361I, M361V, R211K and S48T; others in the reverse transcriptase gene were M41N and D67A.

Following treatment, key PI-associated mutations such as D30N and L90M may be significantly less common in subtype C than in subtype B virus, although there may be some diversity within C subtypes.13 It has also been reported that key reverse transcriptase-associated mutations including D67N, K103N and T215Y are also less common in subtype C as compared to subtype B.1  

References

  1. Cane P et al. Resistance-associated mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype c protease gene from treated and untreated patients in the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol 39: 2652-2654, 2001
  2. Grossman Z et al. Virological response and resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir in subtype-C patients. Twelfth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, abstract 719, 2005
  3. Novitsky V et al. The reverse transcriptase 67N 70R 215Y genotype is the predominant TAM pathway associated with virologic failure among HIV type 1C-infected adults treated with ZDV/ddI-containing HAART in southern Africa. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses23:868-878, 2007
  4. Orrell C et al. HIV-1 clade C resistance genotypes after first virological failure in a large community ART programme Journal of the International AIDS Society 2008, 11(Suppl 1): O3, 2008
  5. Doualla-Bell F et al. High Prevalence of the K65R Mutation in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C Isolates from Infected Patients in Botswana Treated with Didanosine-Based Regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(12): 4182–4185, 2006
  6. Hosseinipour M et al. Resistance profile of patients failing first line ART in Malawi when using clinical and immunologic monitoring. 17th Int AIDS Conf, Mexico City, abstract TUAB0105, 2008
  7. Grossman Z et al. Genetic variation at NNRTI resistance-associated positions in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype C. AIDS 18: 909-915, 2004
  8. Loemba H et al. Genetic divergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Ethiopian clade C reverse transcriptase (RT) and rapid development of resistance against nonnucleoside inhibitors of RT. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46: 2087-2094, 2002
  9. Loveday C et al. Inferior virological responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 subtype C infection: a case controlled study. Antivir Ther 7: S145, 2002
  10. Brenner B et al. A V106M mutation in HIV-1 clade C viruses exposed to efavirenz confers cross-resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. AIDS 17: F1-F5, 2003
  11. Bessong P et al. Baseline genetic drug resistance analysis of South African HIV-1 subtype C proteases. Twelfth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, abstract 721, 2005
  12. Handema R et al. Prevalence of drug-resistance-associated mutations in antiretroviral drug-naive Zambians infected with subtype C HIV-1. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 19: 151-160, 2003
  13. Doualla-Bell F et al. Frequency and patterns of specific PR mutations in Batswana subtype C patients who failed a nelfinavir-containing HAART regimen. Antivir Ther 10: S150, 2005
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.