Subtypes and resistance mutations

To date, it seems that the majority of antiretroviral resistance mutations are shared by viruses of all subtypes. The major resistance mutations found in subtype B HIV-1 infections are also found in non-subtype B HIV-1 infections, with the addition of some novel mutations.1  

NRTI and NNRTI resistance mutations are the most similar across subtypes. Less is known about non-B subtype mutations to protease inhibitors, particularly the newer ones.

All HIV subtypes feature naturally occurring genetic variations known as polymorphisms. Generally, polymorphisms do not confer significant resistance; however, they can in the case of some non-B subtypes. There is also some evidence that some natural polymorphisms are more common in people infected with some non-B subtypes.2 Additionally, in non-B subtypes, polymorphisms tend to become more frequent and more persistent after antiretroviral treatment.

The genetic make-up of HIV-1 can vary among subtypes by as much as 35%, so it is not surprising that there may be different resistance patterns.3 For instance, when single-dose nevirapine is given to prevent mother-to-child transmission, women with subtype C HIV infection tend to develop resistance more frequently than do women with subtype A or D infection.

A Brazilian study of the timing and number of mutations conferring resistance between subtype B or subtype C individuals showed that 54% of subtype B strains were resistant to NRTIs versus 23% of subtype C. The difference narrowed with protease inhibitors: 26% of subtype B strains were resistant versus 23% of subtype C.4 

Geographic differentiation was also found in subtype C incidence of K65R.1 In South Africa, Botswana, and Malawi, the K65R mutation occurred more frequently in thymidine-treated subtype C patients than in subtype B patients. This mutation rarely occurred in patients with subtype A virus.5

In the UK, one study found confirmed primary resistance to more than one drug class in 20% of patients whose HIV was subtype C versus 15% of those who were subtype B-infected. Primary resistance was found in 35% of the small number of non-B/non-C subtype patients.

In those with confirmed resistance, 38% of subtype B patients had NNRTI resistance as compared to 72% of patients with subtype C and 62% of those who were infected with HIV that was not subtype B or C.6 7 

Another Brazilian study of people infected with either subtype B or C and treated with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (Kaletra) showed that L63P occurred more commonly in subtype B than C. Other lopinavir-associated mutations such as L10I/V/F, M46I, F53L, I54V, A71V, V82A, I84V, and L90M had roughly similar prevalence rates in the two subtypes.8

A more complete understanding of resistance mutations in the non-B subtypes is necessary so that clinically significant resistance is recognised and correctly interpreted and cross-resistance and ineffective drug sequencing are prevented.

References

  1. Martinez-Cajas J et al. Differences in resistance mutations among HIV-1 non-subtype B infections: a systematic review of evidence (1996-2008). J Int AIDS Soc 12(1): 11, 2009
  2. Perez-Alvarez L et al. HIV-1 subtype G and BG recombinant viruses in Spanish natives: evidence of characteristic mutations in reverse transcriptase and protease (correspondence). AIDS 15: 1908-1915, 2001
  3. Hemelaar J et al. Global and regional distribution of HIV-1 genetic subtypes and recombinants in 2004. AIDS 20: W13-W23, 2006
  4. Soares EA et al. Differential drug resistance acquisition in HIV-1 of subtypes B and C. PLoS One 2(1): e730, 2007
  5. Gupta RK et al. K65R and Y181C are less prevalent in HAART-experienced HIV-1 subtype A patients. AIDS 19: 1916-1919, 2005
  6. Chilton D et al. Trends in transmitted drug resistance among non-B subtypes in the UK. J Int AIDS Soc 11(Suppl 1):O2, 2008
  7. Orrell C et al. HIV-1 clade C resistance genotypes after first virological failure in a large community ART programme Journal of the International AIDS Society 2008, 11(Suppl 1): O3, 2008
  8. Grossman Z et al. Virological response and resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir in subtype-C patients. Twelfth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, abstract 719, 2005
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.